When Is The Oracle Database View v$sesstat Really Updated?
When Oracle Database Performance Statistics Are Useful
Statistics are meaningful when we understand them and potentially dangerous when we don't. In the Oracle Database performance analysis arena, the instance statistics views (v$[ses,sys]stat) are used quite a bit. While there are many sources describing what a statistic means, what remains elusive is when a statistic is updated. For example, is the execute count updated when a SQL statements starts, ends, or something else?
This posting will provide the answer to when some of the key Oracle Database instance statistics (think: v$sysstat) are updated based on experimental evidence. Plus you can perform the tests yourself. So when does v$sesstat get updated? Interestingly, the answer is, "It depends."
It's a Big Deal When the Statistics Are Updated
While you will hear DBAs talking about when statistics get updated, when this truly becomes something we care about is during long running processes. Especially when there are only a few long running processes. For example, suppose you have long running query that typically takes around 1.75 hours to complete and consumes 2B physical Oracle blocks from the IO subsystem. AND suppose your statistics collection interval is 30 minutes. The table below shows just a few of the possible statistics update scenarios over the six 30 minute periods.
End of each user call. There are three possible user calls; parse, execute, and fetch. (More? Ref #1, Ref #2 ) A query will have a single parse and execute, and potentially many fetches. In this specific example, I'm stating now this query returns only a few rows which requires only a single fetch, resulting in a total of only three user calls. If v$sesstat is updated after each user call, this means nearly all of the physical IO reads will be recorded in period four (P4). Another way of looking at this is if you are monitoring this SQL statement's block reads, you'll see no activity until period four, and then BAM! Surprise! The 2B physical reads will be record in period P4! For quick OLTP activity this wouldn't typically be a problem, but for long running SQL it can be misleading.
End of the statement. No activity will be recorded until period P4 and then BAM! the 2B physical reads will be recorded! Good luck trying to match that with the IO subsystem activity. For quick OLTP statements, this wouldn't typically be a problem.
Every 3 seconds. This is what we would like, as we would see the physical read activity occur pretty much when it actually did occur.
Start of next statement. For OLTP activity, this wouldn't be such a big deal. But suppose the next statement doesn't start for quite a while? And then BAM! all the physical reads will be shown not when the query finished but perhaps a long time after. Not a good reflection of reality.
So what's the real answer? To answer the question I needed to create an experiment...
Let's See What Really Happens: The Experiment
The experimental design is actually quite simple. There are three parts. You can view all three parts in this single text file here.
Part 1 is the application user. That is, this is the code which the "monitoring user" will be monitoring. As you can see here, the code consists of setup (load the table), getting the user's SID (so I know which SID to monitor), and finally the test SQL that I will be monitoring. I run this is a few times so, on my test system, I generally know how long it takes to complete all the SQL. On my system this is about 90 seconds.
Part 2 is the DBA or the monitoring user. After the Part 1 test SQL begins, I will start the monitoring SQL. This SQL is very straightforward: drop the experimental data table, create the experimental table, and then every second sample all the stats from v$sesstat for this application user's SID. Because on my system the application user's SQL takes around 90 seconds to complete, I sampled for 100 seconds, which at a one second interval means 100 samples are collected and stored.
Part 3 is the reporting SQL where I simply select the experimental data that I collected in Part 2. I have various reporting SQL. Some is more visually pleasing and some is better for direct input into my Mathematica notepad used for the actual analysis.
The experiment was run a few times just to ensure the results were consistent... and they were. I detected no differences. In fact, a few months back I performed a similar experiment and the results where the same.
Since data for all v$sesstat statistics were collected I can compare when the various statistics are updated. I selected six statistics. I selected them because I use them often in my performance analysis work. Here is the list (statistic #, statistic name, show description):
11. session logical reads. That is, a buffer get (logical IO).
14. CPU used by this session. This is the CPU consumed by the session in centi-seconds.
44. physical read total IO requests. This is the total IO read requests. This is NOT the number of Oracle blocks read but actual IO calls. One Oracle IO request can contain multiple blocks, that is, a multi block read.
72. physical reads. This is the number of Oracle blocks read. This is NOT the number of IO requests, but the number of actual Oracle blocks read as the result of the IO requests.
549. parse count (total). This is the number of parses; hard and soft. I don't know if the "softer" parse is included, which occurs when there is a hit in a session's cursor cache.
554. execute count. This is the number of SQL executions; selects, inserts, updates, delete, and DDL. I have not verified this and will be checked in a later experiment.
Statistics Reporting and initial observation.
For each of the 100 samples, all v$sesstat were collected. But as mentioned above, I only analyzed six statistics.
What I am specifically looking for is when a statistic value changes and relating that back to what the application user's Oracle session was doing (or not doing!). So I want to know what the application user (i.e., the running script) is doing when the statistic value changes. By comparing the statistic value change time stamp with the application SQL timestamp, I can understand when and hopefully why the statistic value changed.
You can look at all the raw experimental results here in this file. If you would like to perform some additional analysis yourself.
You can also download the exported table that contains all the v$sesstat experimental data HERE. It's pretty cool!
When looking at the two data sets below, it is important to know the first query begins at time (STAMP) 85.
Here is an example of the results for statistic physical reads (#72):
STATISTIC# STAMP VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- 72 80 112270 . . . 72 84 112270 72 85 115034 72 86 137321 72 87 138070 72 88 138756 72 89 139646 72 90 140681 72 91 141596 . . .
Notice that the above statistic value is always changing. Below is an example for the statistic session logical reads (#11):
STATISTIC# STAMP VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- ... 11 83 75155 11 84 75155 11 85 77917 11 86 100142 11 87 100142 ... 11 97 100142 11 98 100142 11 99 100142 11 100 118547 11 101 125129 11 102 125129 11 103 125129 ... 11 117 125129 11 118 125129 11 119 129823 11 120 150116 11 121 150116 ... 11 133 150116 11 134 174371 11 135 175103 11 136 175103 ... 11 156 175103 11 157 175103 11 158 175106 11 159 175106 11 160 175106 11 161 175106 11 162 175106 11 163 175109 11 164 175109 11 165 175109 . . .
Notice above how for session logical reads (#11) the statistic values don't constantly change. There must be some event that triggers the value change. Even a quick review of the above data demonstrates instance statistics are updated for different reasons!
To understand when and hopefully why a specific statistic is change, we must know what the application "user" is doing at various points in time. Below is a table containing a time identifier (ID), the activity time stamp (Time), and the related activity (Activity 1, Activity 2). Take a moment and scan through this table.
For example, at time 85 (ID A) the big query starts and at time 100 (ID B) it completed and then was immediately run again. After it completed the second time at time 114 (ID C) there was a five second sleep period (dbms_lock.sleep(5)) and when the sleep completed (ID D), the big query started once again...
Now let's look at what occurred from a time, application user, and instance statistic perspective. Looking at the plot below, you can see the horizontal axis is time and the IDs along with their associated time stamps are clearly labeled. The vertical axis contains either the application activity event (Appl) or a specific instance statistic (e.g., LIO, CPU) change. Each blue dot represents a change occurred; either an application activity or a statistic value change.
Even a quick glance at the above plot clearly shows that various instance statistics are updated at different times. For example, physical IO block reads (PIO rds) are updated very often in contrast to executions (exec) which are updated infrequently. To really understand what is occurring we need to compare when a statistic change occurred in conjunction with what the application is doing. Also, it may be helpful to reference the raw experimental data. As I mentioned above, you can look at all the raw experimental results here in this file HERE.
Specific Statistics Analysis.
Let's look closely at each of the instance statistics analyzed.
Summary: This experiment indicates the LIOs statistic is updated when the next statement begins. I know, this seems really strange, but this experiment and others I have performed clearly show this to be true.
Basis: Because the big query begins at time 85 (A) and time 100 (B), it initially appears that LIOs are updated when a statement begins and ends. However, if you look closely at when the big query ended at time 114 (C), LIOs are not updated! Rather, five seconds later at time 119 (D) is when the LIOs are updated! It's important to notice that time 119 (D) is after the five second sleep and the next query begins!!! This is not an anomaly because this occurs again at time 158 (G/H): the query ends at time 148 (F). So it's very clear the LIOs are not updated when the query completed or during the query, but when the next statement begins!
So if you are gathering the LIOs statistic for a specific session, make sure to start another statement so the statistic value is updated! Even a "select * from dual" will trigger the LIO statistic update.
Summary: This experiment indicates session CPU consumption is updated when the statement completes.
Basis: For the first few queries (big queries) starting at times 85 (A), 100 (B), 119 (D), and 134 (E), the CPU consumption is updated when the query completes at time 100 (B), 114 (C), 134 (E), and 148 (F) respectively. However, when the small sub-second queries complete (time 158 (G/H), 162 (I/J), 173 (K)) CPU consumption is not updated. Why? My guess is because the small query consumes so little CPU the results rounds to the current number displayed.
So if you are gathering session CPU consumption be aware that the CPU consumption will not be updated until the statement completes.
Physical Reads (PIO).
Summary: The PIO statistic is frequently updated and when a statement completes.
Basis: My experiment showed PIOs where updated during each experimental sample, which occurred every second. And for a sub-second statement (time 158 (G/H)) a PIO change occurred when the query completed; also at time 158 (G/H) which was then followed by a five second sleep.
My experimental queries only required one fetch. Therefore, this experiment also demonstrates a starting or completed fetch is not required for the PIO statistic is updated.
Physical Read Requests.
Summary: The data clearly shows the same behavior as with physical reads (see above).
Summary: The parse count statistic is updated when the parse occurs.
Basis: It appears that when a parse occurs the statistic is incremented by one and recorded, which is at the beginning of a statement. In my experiment, every application event and activity time contained a parse (even the sleep call requires a parse) and at every activity time the parse count was incremented. Good news if you are counting parses.
Summary: The execute count statistic is updated as with the parse count (see above).
Even if I have made mistakes in my analysis or my experiment is improved, two points are clear:
1. Instance statistics are not updated at the same time, that is, there are different triggers.
2. My experiments demonstrated four possible statistic value change triggers: when a statement begins (parse and execute), throughout processing (physical IO reads and requests), statement completion (CPU consumption), and when the next statement begins (LIO).
So when do the v$sesstat statistics get updated? As a highly paid consultant would say, "It depends."
Thanks for reading!
Start my FREE 18 lesson Machine Learning For Oracle Professionals E-Course here.
Craig Shallahamer is a long time Oracle DBA who specializes in predictive analytics, machine learning and Oracle performance tuning. Craig is a performance researcher and blogger, consultant, author of two books, an enthusiastic conference speaker a passionate teacher and an Oracle ACE Director. More about Craig Shallahamer...
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to email me directly at craig at orapub.com.
|Wanna Bet? Cool Facts About The Central Limit Theorem.||Does Table Column Order Affect SELECT Performance?||Understanding Skewed Oracle Database Wait Event Time Patterns|