Is Oracle Database Time Correct? Something Is Not Quite Right
Oracle Database tuning and performance analysis is usually based on time. As I blogged HERE, the Oracle "database time" statistic is more interesting than simply "time spent in the database." It is the sum of CPU consumption and non-idle wait time. And Elapsed Time is the sum of all the database time related to perhaps a session or a SQL statement execution. However...
If you do the fundamental math, you'll notice the numbers don't always add up. In fact, they rarely match. In this posting, I want to demonstrate this mismatch and I want you to see this on your systems!
I'll include experimental data from a number of different systems, the statistical analysis (including pictures) and provide a tool you can download for free from OraPub.com to check out the situation on your systems.
Checking DB Time Math
DB Time is defined as "time spent in the database." This is the sum of Oracle process CPU consumption plus non-idle wait time. Usually we don't derive DB Time. The Time Model Statistics view v$sys_time_mode contains the DB Time statistic. But this view also contains the DB CPU statistic. Since there is no sum of non-idle wait time, most people just assume everything is fine.
However, if you run the simple query below on your system, it could look something this:
SQL> l 1 select db_time_s, db_cpu_s, tot_ni_wt_s 2 from (select value/1000000 db_time_s from v$sys_time_model where stat_name = 'DB time' ), 3 (select value/1000000 db_cpu_s from v$sys_time_model where stat_name = 'DB CPU' ), 4* (select sum(TIME_WAITED_MICRO_FG)/1000000 tot_ni_wt_s from v$system_event where wait_class != 'Idle' ) SQL> / DB_TIME_S DB_CPU_S TOT_NI_WT_S ---------- ---------- ----------- 330165.527 231403.925 119942.952 1 row selected.
If you add up the DB CPU and the total non-idle wait time, the value is 351,346.877. Woops! 351K does not equal 330K. What happened on my Oracle Database 12c (184.108.40.206.0)? As I have demonstrated in this POSTING (which contains videos of this) and in my online seminar training HERE, many times DB Time does nearly equal DB CPU plus the non-idle wait time. But clearly in the above situation something does not seem quite right.
Checking DB Time On Your Systems
To demonstrate the possibility of a DB Time mismatch, I created a simple plsql tool. You can download this free tool or do an OraPub.com search for "db time tool". The tool, which is easily configurable, takes a number of samples over a period of time and displays the output.
Here is an example of the output.
OraPub DB Time Test v1a 26-Sep-2014. Enjoy but use at your own risk. . Starting to collect 11 180 second samples now... All displayed times are in seconds. . anonymer Block abgeschlossen .......................................................................... ... RAW OUTPUT (keep the output for your records and analysis) .......................................................................... . sample#, db_time_delta_v , db_cpu_delta_v, tot_ni_wait_delta_v, derived_db_time_delta_v, diff_v, diff_pct_v . 1, 128,4, 128,254, ,103, 128,357266, ,043, 0 2, 22,014, 3,883, 17,731, 21,614215, ,399, 1,8 3, 1,625, 1,251, ,003, 1,253703, ,371, 22,8 4, 13,967, 12,719, 1,476, 14,194999, -,228, -1,6 5, 41,086, 41,259, ,228, 41,486482, -,4, -1 6, 36,872, 36,466, ,127, 36,593884, ,278, ,8 7, 38,545, 38,71, ,137, 38,847459, -,303, -,8 8, 37,264, 37,341, ,122, 37,463525, -,199, -,5 9, 22,818, 22,866, ,102, 22,967141, -,149, -,7 10, 30,985, 30,614, ,109, 30,723831, ,261, ,8 11, 5,795, 5,445, ,513, 5,958586, -,164, -2,8 . The test is complete. . All displayed times are in seconds.
The output is formatted to make it easy to statistically analyze. The far right column is percent difference between the reported DB Time and the calculated DB Time. In the above example, they are pretty close. Get the tool and try it out on your systems.
Some Actual Examples
I want to quickly show you four examples from a variety of systems. You can DOWNLOAD all the data in the "analysis pack" HERE. The data, for each of the four systems, contains the raw DB Time Test output (like in the section above), the statistical numeric analysis output from the statistical package "R", the actual "R" script and the visual analysis using "smooth histograms" also created using "R."
Below is the statistical numeric summary:
About the columns: Only the "craig" system is mine and other are real production or DEV/QA systems. The statistical columns all reference the far right column of the DB Time Test Tool's output, which is the percent difference between the reported DB Time and the calculated DB Time. Each sample set consists of eleven 180 second samples. The P-Value greater than 0.05 means the reported and calculated DB Time differences are normally distributed. This is not important in this analysis, but gives me clues if there is a problem with the data collection.
As you can easily see, two of the system's "DB Times" difference is greater than 10% and one of them was over 20%. The data collected shows that something is not quite right... but that's about it.
What Does This Mean In Our Work?
Clearly something is not quite right. There are a number of possible reasons and this will be focus of my next few articles.
However, I want to say that even though the numbers don't match perfectly and sometimes they are way off, this does not negate the value of a time based analysis. Remember, we not trying to land a man on the moon. We try diagnosing performance to derive solutions that (usually) aim to reduce the database time. I suspect that in all four cases I show, we would not be misled.
But this does highlight the requirement to also analysis performance from a non-Oracle database centric perspective. I always look at the performance situation from an operating system perspective, an Oracle centric perspective and an application (think: SQL, processes, user experience, etc.) perspective. This "3 Circle" analysis will reduce the likelihood of making a tuning diagnosis mistake. So in case DB Time is completely messed up, by diagnosing performance from the other two "circles" you will know something is not right.
If you want to learn more about my "3-Circle" analysis, here are two resources:
- Paper. Total Performance Management. Do an OraPub search for "3 circle" and you'll find it.
- Online Seminar: Tuning Oracle Using An AWR Report. I go DEEP into an Oracle Time Based Analysis while focusing on how to do an Oracle Time Based Analysis. It's super practical.
In my next few articles I will drill down into why there can be a "DB Time mismatch," what to do about it and how to use this knowledge to our advantage.
Enjoy your work! There is nothing quite like analyzing performance and tuning Oracle database systems!!
Start my FREE 18 lesson Machine Learning For Oracle Professionals E-Course here.
Craig Shallahamer is a long time Oracle DBA who specializes in predictive analytics, machine learning and Oracle performance tuning. Craig is a performance researcher and blogger, consultant, author of two books, an enthusiastic conference speaker a passionate teacher and an Oracle ACE Director. More about Craig Shallahamer...
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to email me directly at craig at orapub.com.
|How To Quickly Install The Free Statistics Package R||How To Use An AWR Report To Create Correct Wait Event Based Histograms||What Is Oracle Database Elapsed Time And Wall Time With A Parallelism Twist|